Engagement model

Evaluation Conflict-sensitive evaluations across the programme lifecycle.

Donors, multilaterals and INGOs commissioning formative, midterm or endline evaluations in fragile and conflict-affected contexts.

Independent mixed-methods evaluations: document review, KII, FGD, survey, and — where the question warrants — Optics tools as analytical infrastructure (PRISM compound risk, IRIS narrative monitoring, ToC Tester theory-of-change critique). Conflict-sensitive by default. Bilingual reporting. Outputs are auditable: features behind classifications, indicators behind narratives, evidence behind every claim.

What's included

  • Mixed-methods: KII, FGD, survey, document review
  • Theory-of-change critique with ToC Tester where useful
  • Bilingual reporting (English + working language)
  • DPIA per engagement, IASC and OECD-DAC aligned
Start a conversation →← All engagement models